Skip to main content

Napoleon, Ch. 21 Wagram

Extraordinary horseman--600 miles in six days to check on his army--leaving Spain and returning to Paris to put together a new army to put down Austria.

Enormous size of army:  230,000 troops called up to join nearly 500,000 troops.

Austria at war.  Tsar Alexander, supposed to be an ally of Napoleon, sends troops to fight Austria, but the troops make no effort to engage. Two casualties in the entire campaign! N. furious.

Some of the troops fighting the Austrians (Bavarians, for example) fought without a single French soldier in their company.  Tremendous belief in Napoleon as leader and as bringer of a more just society.

Napoleon, outside the walls of Vienna, looks up to see Viennese citizens looking down at him.  When they recognize him, they cheer.  Amazing--their country is at war with him.  The same thing happened at Brandenburg. Napoleon rode around to cheering for 30 minutes.

Crossing the Danube to fight the Austrians:  "Through intense planning & preparation, Napoleon got this enormous polyglot force, roughly the same number as attacked Normandy on D-Day, across one of Europe's largest rivers into enemy territory in a single night, with all its horses, cannon, wagons, supplies and ammunition, and without losing a single man. "

Able to sleep on a battlefield with 700 cannon firing--Austria defeated.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Netflix Lincoln Lawyer

 Just a long yawner.  Acting was fine; there just wasn't nearly enough plot to carry 10 episodes.  Tech guy accused of killing wife.  LL takes on the case after the tech lawyer's first lawyer is murdered.  Mickey Haller gets the guy off . . . trick is the guy is guilty.  He used a drone to dispose of bloody clothes.  Subplot Maggy McFierce trying to get a conviction of a human trafficker.  She loses but then wins.  The divorced couple almost gets back together, but they are on opposite sides of the adversarial process and work comes first.  Won't be in a hurry to watch Season 2

Live and Let Die

 The Fleming book, flawed by 50's racism, moves along in plot and character.  Fleming is an excellent writer--great descriptive powers and pacing. The movie has no redeeming qualities.  All that's left from the book is the racism, and in the book you can feel Fleming's doubts about his racist scenes slipping in.  In the movie (made years later), the racism is incredible.  1972.  Those who say no progress has been made should watch this.  Impossible to imagine this film being made today.