Skip to main content

Napoleon 25 Retreat

N:  "More battles are lost by loss of hope than by loss of blood."

After the battle, N's horse steps on Russian soldier. An aide says:  "It's only a Russian." N replies:  "After a victory, there are no enemies, only men."
N:  ""There is but a step from the sublime to the ridiculous."


Moscow abandoned . . . Soldiers believe they are safe, that they will live in the homes and eat the abandoned food . . . However, Tsar has left behind arsonists who burn their own city . . . winds help . . . French don't know where the fire trucks, etc. are located (Russians destroyed them) . . . Fires so bright people could read by the light . . . Napoleon:  It is their own work. So many palaces. What extraordinary resolution. What men! Later, when Paris is invaded, N. comments that the French would never burn Paris to keep invaders from ransacking it. .  . Russian troops in trouble  . . . food shortages, clothing shortages, illness, cold . . . N. approaches the Tsar with offers of peace treaty . . . . Napoleon leaves Moscow in mid-October, 1812 . . . Battle of Maloyaroslavets--French win the battle, but lose so many men so far from home in such miserable circumstances that the victory is hallow. . . Need to leave Moscow and go to Smolensk due to lack of provisions in Moscow . . . Winter, retreat: Russian plaque-- "End of offensive. Start of ruin and rout of the enemy." . . . retreating army tramping through cold . . . picked off as they retreat . . . starving, freezing . . . "Retreat reminiscent of Bosch's depiction of Hades."  November  -30 C . . . cannibalism . . .  Force down to 60,000 . . .  Smolensk provisions eaten in one day . . . Incredible engineering feat to get French army across freezing waters of Berezina River. Dutch engineers build a bridge and army crosses at Studzianka, which means "very, very cold . . . soldiers swear at N when they see him . . . whole army crosses on makeshift bridges in two days--amazing! . . . Trouble in Paris for N.  . . . he announces that he must return to Paris on December 5, and does so . . . needs to protect his political strength in the midst of disaster. . .
Napoleon had lost 525,000 men . . . 100,000 of these captured.  ... Many units at 5% of strength . . .

THE SPELL IS BROKEN--TSAR ALEXANDER

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Tomorrow and Tomorrow and Tomorrow by Gabrielle Zevin . . . finished

 Follows Sadie and Sam (Mazer) from childhood to mid-thirties when both are feeling old and a bit out of it in the gaming world.  Characters are well-rounded, develop throughout the novel in interesting way.  Plot is involved but sensible.  Not a single, "Oh, come on!" moment.  The book could have been faster paced. Odd, since the main topic is video games which are not for their speed of engagement and Gabrielle Zevin clearly knows her video games. Recommended by Michael Connelly in an interview.  He also has Bosch pick up the book in his novel, Resurrection Walk, as Bosch tails a possible witness to a crime as she moves through a bookstore. Sadie and Sam do not get together at the end, which is good.   Marx killed by homophobic nutcase who really wants to kill Sam, but Sam isn't there. Marx is father of Sadie's child. 

The Secret, Book and Scone Society

Cozy mystery with a "women are superior creatures" underpinning. The four women have all had their struggles, which we will learn about one-by-one, but they all remain/emerge wiser, kinder, smarter, etc. than the men in the novel, most of whom are corrupt, narrow-minded, unfeeling and potentially violent. (Nora's encounter with the paramedic-hunk is the exception, though it occurs to me that he may be the murderer.) Even Estelle, who uses sex to get what she wants, is portrayed positively.  The men are comically manipulated by her curves.  In one scene, she goes skinny-dipping with a married man but is rescued by her buddies before she actually has sex with the guy. Nora, our main character, is told by her female friends that she is beautiful despite her scars. No male says this to Nora because males are just too crass to see beyond surface beauty.  I hope I'm wrong and the book is more nuanced. If not, then this author is a one-and-done writer for me.