Skip to main content

Travels in Siberia 1-3

by Ian Frazier

Enjoying this very much.  It's like being at a dinner party and hearing a adventurous traveler spin tales.  No hurry, enjoy the details.

Great moments in 1 to 3.

Description by his friend Katya of women's bathroom in Moscow with a woman washing her dishes, pots, pans in the sink.  "Where could she have come from?  I have no idea. She is scrubbing away.  There are chicken bones by the edge of the sink."

Book to read:  John Reed, 10 Days that Shook the World.

 Plane in remote airport sitting out on the runway for lengthy period of time, passengers quietly waiting until someone shows up to get them off.

Giant head of Lenin in Ulan-Ude:  "The first time I saw the head I thought it creepy, like a sci-fi symbol that ranks of drone soldiers would goose step before."

Food of Ulan-Ude is primarily horsemeat.  "You can buy canned pony year round in Ulan-Ude."

Resort:  "I was made a bit nervous by the resort's manager, a large blunt-faced man, . . . and especially by his habit of carrying a Kalashnikov assault rifle everywhere he went."

Discussing metaphysical matters with a friend by a river.  "In the middle of the conversation, a drunk came out of the darkness carrying a fish he wanted to trade for vodka."

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Netflix Lincoln Lawyer

 Just a long yawner.  Acting was fine; there just wasn't nearly enough plot to carry 10 episodes.  Tech guy accused of killing wife.  LL takes on the case after the tech lawyer's first lawyer is murdered.  Mickey Haller gets the guy off . . . trick is the guy is guilty.  He used a drone to dispose of bloody clothes.  Subplot Maggy McFierce trying to get a conviction of a human trafficker.  She loses but then wins.  The divorced couple almost gets back together, but they are on opposite sides of the adversarial process and work comes first.  Won't be in a hurry to watch Season 2

Live and Let Die

 The Fleming book, flawed by 50's racism, moves along in plot and character.  Fleming is an excellent writer--great descriptive powers and pacing. The movie has no redeeming qualities.  All that's left from the book is the racism, and in the book you can feel Fleming's doubts about his racist scenes slipping in.  In the movie (made years later), the racism is incredible.  1972.  Those who say no progress has been made should watch this.  Impossible to imagine this film being made today.