Skip to main content

Buddenbrooks 70%

Terrific family novel.  All characters well-rounded.
Thomas:  holding the family together, integrity, common sense, some imagination, tense, weighed down by the burden of his name.
Christian: younger brother, hypochondriac, profligate, failure in business, womanizer, drain on family resources, irritates Thomas because he so readily recognizes Thomas's superiority in business yet doesn't seem to care.
Tony: sister, "I am not a silly goose.", two unsuccessful marriages, daughter Erika marries, and Tony in a way gets her third shot at marriage, did not marry her one true love early on because she needed to keep up the Buddenbrook name.
Thomas's son: Johann, weak, overly sensitive, the last of the line.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Netflix Lincoln Lawyer

 Just a long yawner.  Acting was fine; there just wasn't nearly enough plot to carry 10 episodes.  Tech guy accused of killing wife.  LL takes on the case after the tech lawyer's first lawyer is murdered.  Mickey Haller gets the guy off . . . trick is the guy is guilty.  He used a drone to dispose of bloody clothes.  Subplot Maggy McFierce trying to get a conviction of a human trafficker.  She loses but then wins.  The divorced couple almost gets back together, but they are on opposite sides of the adversarial process and work comes first.  Won't be in a hurry to watch Season 2

Live and Let Die

 The Fleming book, flawed by 50's racism, moves along in plot and character.  Fleming is an excellent writer--great descriptive powers and pacing. The movie has no redeeming qualities.  All that's left from the book is the racism, and in the book you can feel Fleming's doubts about his racist scenes slipping in.  In the movie (made years later), the racism is incredible.  1972.  Those who say no progress has been made should watch this.  Impossible to imagine this film being made today.