Skip to main content

Prisoners of Geography: Europe

Western Europe
Many languages and countries due to the geography of the region.  Pyrenees, for example, separate France from Spain.  Good rivers, though, with France being most fortunate.  Seine goes to Atlantic; Rhone to Med. Sea. Rivers do not connect as Missouri with Mississippi, so they form natural boundaries. Southern Europe is less fortunate.  Worse farmland, more drought, rockier, higher temps. Greece, Sicily, Spain.  The notion of lazy southerners comes entirely from geography which makes farming, for example, both difficult and less lucrative.

Germany--poised between Russia and France has two options.  France has one.  French need peace and unity with Germany as they have little geographic protection.

EU:  Fragile always.  Greeks resent German wealth. Germans resent Greek early retirement lifestyle. WWII looms in background. Kissinger:  When I want to talk to Europe, whom do I call?

UK:  Island nation protected in many ways.  Needs Scotland to control North Sea.  Losing Scotland from UK would be great blow to naval power, such as it is.

Serbia as interesting case. Linguistic and religious ties to Russia, more than Europe. Courted by Russia.  Fracture line?

And, finally, is it possible that Europe could come apart?  Unlikely, but as years pass since WWI and WWII, probably more possible.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Netflix Lincoln Lawyer

 Just a long yawner.  Acting was fine; there just wasn't nearly enough plot to carry 10 episodes.  Tech guy accused of killing wife.  LL takes on the case after the tech lawyer's first lawyer is murdered.  Mickey Haller gets the guy off . . . trick is the guy is guilty.  He used a drone to dispose of bloody clothes.  Subplot Maggy McFierce trying to get a conviction of a human trafficker.  She loses but then wins.  The divorced couple almost gets back together, but they are on opposite sides of the adversarial process and work comes first.  Won't be in a hurry to watch Season 2

Live and Let Die

 The Fleming book, flawed by 50's racism, moves along in plot and character.  Fleming is an excellent writer--great descriptive powers and pacing. The movie has no redeeming qualities.  All that's left from the book is the racism, and in the book you can feel Fleming's doubts about his racist scenes slipping in.  In the movie (made years later), the racism is incredible.  1972.  Those who say no progress has been made should watch this.  Impossible to imagine this film being made today.