Skip to main content

Whose Body, concluded

Quite a complicated plot.  The murderer is a surgeon and scientist, Dr. Julian Freke.  He believes that conscience is utter nonsense.  He murders Reuben Levy because Levy bested him in love years earlier, but also to prove his point about conscience. Wimsey somehow sees the whole picture and solves the crime.  I'm not sure I get it yet.  It goes something like this:  Freke, a dissector of bodies for his occupation, comes upon a vagrant who looks something like Levy.  This man dies of a broken neck.  Freke then kills Levy by breaking his neck with a poker.  Freke substitutes Levy for the vagrant.  A team of dissectors work on him and then bury him.  Great . . . except Freke has an extra body . . . the vagrant.  Here's where it gets interesting.  Rather than just disposing of the body somehow, Freke makes the man look as much like Levy as possible, transports it across a rooftop, and deposits it in the bathtub of a neighbor.  This causes the police no end of confusion, which I guess is Freke's point.  Wimsey figures it out, though.

Some nice sardonic English humor  throughout. I'll probably read another Sayers book some day, but no rush.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Tomorrow and Tomorrow and Tomorrow by Gabrielle Zevin . . . finished

 Follows Sadie and Sam (Mazer) from childhood to mid-thirties when both are feeling old and a bit out of it in the gaming world.  Characters are well-rounded, develop throughout the novel in interesting way.  Plot is involved but sensible.  Not a single, "Oh, come on!" moment.  The book could have been faster paced. Odd, since the main topic is video games which are not for their speed of engagement and Gabrielle Zevin clearly knows her video games. Recommended by Michael Connelly in an interview.  He also has Bosch pick up the book in his novel, Resurrection Walk, as Bosch tails a possible witness to a crime as she moves through a bookstore. Sadie and Sam do not get together at the end, which is good.   Marx killed by homophobic nutcase who really wants to kill Sam, but Sam isn't there. Marx is father of Sadie's child. 
Post a Comment
Read more

Tess of the D'Urbervilles, continued 2/3rds

"To all humankind, Tess was only a passing thought. Even to friends, she was only a frequently passing thought." Angel Clare is a good character. He's "enlightened," in so many ways, but when Tess's confesses her "crime," he reverts to ancestral form . . . Tess's "confession" comes earlier than I expected, right after Angel reveals that he has had a bad moment with a woman. Tess points out the similarity in their transgressions, though his is the only true transgression, expecting forgiveness. She doesn't get it. She returns to her mother . . . realizes she can't stay with her. Thoughts to suicide. Unhappiness that divorce is not possible. Departs. Tragic in that the two, if Angel could just see clearly, would indeed be a great couple, each adding to the other.  Nature as a definite force involved in the tragedy.  It's not neutral--when things go bad, the very skies mock Tess. Tess as unaware of the power of her bea...
Post a Comment
Read more