Skip to main content

Secrets of Eden 30%

Got a nice note from Bohjalian thanking me for commenting on his book--what a good guy!

Finished (at least for a while) with narrator 1, the minister. Really well done--he slowly reveals himself to be an unreliable narrator (a man of the cloth with a strong sex drive), but is he unreliable when it comes to the murder?  He leaves his small town quickly after the funeral because (he says) of a crisis of faith.  He also rather quickly beds Heather, the "Angel" author who he visits in NYC.

Just started Narrator Two.  I should know whether she's a DA or a detective, but listening in the car does that to you. Anyway, she definitely is throwing suspicion on our reverend.  Maybe not a murder/suicide. Maybe a murder/murder. Why did the good reverend beat it out of town so quickly?  Pathologist is skeptical, too.
Plot thickens as characters develop--what more could I want?

(Audible reader of the Reverend section was terrific. Just a little defensive tone in his voice on occasion, the suspicious "slips" aren't signaled overtly.  Very convincing.  I've only listened to a few pages of the female law officer, but that narration seems equally good. Playing golf to tomorrow 40 minutes away--80 minutes of listening!)


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Netflix Lincoln Lawyer

 Just a long yawner.  Acting was fine; there just wasn't nearly enough plot to carry 10 episodes.  Tech guy accused of killing wife.  LL takes on the case after the tech lawyer's first lawyer is murdered.  Mickey Haller gets the guy off . . . trick is the guy is guilty.  He used a drone to dispose of bloody clothes.  Subplot Maggy McFierce trying to get a conviction of a human trafficker.  She loses but then wins.  The divorced couple almost gets back together, but they are on opposite sides of the adversarial process and work comes first.  Won't be in a hurry to watch Season 2

Live and Let Die

 The Fleming book, flawed by 50's racism, moves along in plot and character.  Fleming is an excellent writer--great descriptive powers and pacing. The movie has no redeeming qualities.  All that's left from the book is the racism, and in the book you can feel Fleming's doubts about his racist scenes slipping in.  In the movie (made years later), the racism is incredible.  1972.  Those who say no progress has been made should watch this.  Impossible to imagine this film being made today.