Skip to main content

Strangler Vine finished

The resolution of the mystery is not strong.  In essence, Blake discovers that the bureaucrat he thought responsible was, instead, simply mistaken in his persecution of the thugges, not evil.  However, another bureaucrat was downright evil.  Really, as a reader, which bureaucrat is to blame isn't compelling.  Blake and Avery also agree to keep their discoveries and the facts around the murder of Mountstuart semi-hushed up . . . again, not dramatic.

However . . . the creation of the feel of India was great.  Both Avery and Blake were well-rounded.  The afterward helps in understanding the historical context and the controversy over the "thugs."  Did they even exist.  An example of the subtlety:  Avery ends the book with the plan to marry his sweetheart.  Blake congratulates him, then says something to the effect of:  "But you know, my young friend, your eyes have been opened to the corruption at the core of the English domination of India.  Can you really be a good English husband going to English parties in India?  Will you be able to listen to the nonsense?"  It's a good questions . . . the happy marriage ending is undercut.  I'll read another by M.J. Carter.

Oh, exciting gunplay, fighting, escapes.  As much an adventure story as a mystery.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Netflix Lincoln Lawyer

 Just a long yawner.  Acting was fine; there just wasn't nearly enough plot to carry 10 episodes.  Tech guy accused of killing wife.  LL takes on the case after the tech lawyer's first lawyer is murdered.  Mickey Haller gets the guy off . . . trick is the guy is guilty.  He used a drone to dispose of bloody clothes.  Subplot Maggy McFierce trying to get a conviction of a human trafficker.  She loses but then wins.  The divorced couple almost gets back together, but they are on opposite sides of the adversarial process and work comes first.  Won't be in a hurry to watch Season 2

Live and Let Die

 The Fleming book, flawed by 50's racism, moves along in plot and character.  Fleming is an excellent writer--great descriptive powers and pacing. The movie has no redeeming qualities.  All that's left from the book is the racism, and in the book you can feel Fleming's doubts about his racist scenes slipping in.  In the movie (made years later), the racism is incredible.  1972.  Those who say no progress has been made should watch this.  Impossible to imagine this film being made today.